The Toulmin zebra Model, from, stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.
Think about that beer how you coupe talked your parents into letting you borrow what the what family car.
Consider this: your instructors probably know a lot more what than you do about your subject matter.
Use evidence to press avoid generalizations.You may respond by pointing out an assumption made by your critic and testing that does assumption.Advance the best argument further.To make the book most effective argument possible, you should consider not only what students would say about seating but also what alumni who have paid a lot to get good seats does might say.What is an Argument?Secondary sources: articles and books from your class that explain and interpret the historical event or what person you are writing about, lecture notes, films or documentaries.A demonstration of your ability to use or apply the material in ways that go beyond what you have read or heard."By 'argument' I mean the process whereby a person reasons his or her way from one idea to the choice of another idea.Another person may be able to imagine counterarguments that havent occurred to you. By considering what someone who disagrees with does your position might have to what say about your argument, you show that you have thought make things through, and make you dispose of some of the what reasons your audience might have for make not accepting your argument.
State the thesis of your argument.
One ran by one-track minds that arent willing to look at the issue with new eyes?
Some of her foods points did make sense to me when I read the article again from a kill different perspective.The feel exception is some social science research in which you want a guiding research question to serve this purpose.To develop your argument, you would then define what your terms and prove your claim with evidence from Wrights drawings and buildings makes and those of the other architects you mentioned.See potential issues above.A restatement of the claim incorporating the evidence and/or relating the claim back to the macroargument it is a part.